Tam’s Immortal Now

…she’s been quoted in a Law Review Article! As the person you cite when you want to quote the epitome of “grassroots, non-lawyer gun rights supporters.” Sounds right to me.
p. 17: “This view has also been a commonly-held understanding of Miller among grassroots, non-lawyer gun rights supporters.” [note 51]

Footnote 51: See, e.g., Who the Hell is Jim Zumbo?, Posting at View from the Porch, Feb. 18, 2007, 10:02 a.m.,
http://booksbikesboomsticks.blogspot.com/2007/02/boomsticks- who-hell-is-jim-zumbo.html (“An argument could be made (and has been, by the Supreme Court in the Miller decision) that [unlike military-pattern semi-automatic rifles] […] hunting guns are not Constitutionally protected at all, except those that meet the requirements for militia service.”).

— Professor Michael P. O’Shea, “The Right to Defensive Arms after District of Columbia v. Heller,” forthcoming in 111 W. Va. Law Review (2009)

This entry was posted in Kewel!. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Tam’s Immortal Now

  1. Kristopher says:

    Jebus … that thread was still attracting comment into the middle of the year.

Comments are closed.