RNS Quote of the Day: 03/03/10
Over at CCinZ, they get their destruction fetish on (in a good way, of course).
Apart from the thermonuclear warheads, SLAM itself was also a very formidable weapon. The sonic boom of a 25+ m long vehicle flying at Mach 3+ at 300 m altitude would cause severe destruction in non-hardened structures on the ground. Additionally, the nuclear ramjet continuously left a trail of highly radioactive dust, which would seriously contaminate the area below the missile. Finally, when the SLAM eventually crashed itself at the end of the mission, it would leave a wreckage of a very hot and radioactive (”dirty”) nuclear reactor.
Sounds like fun. So much so that it makes some folks angry.
I just love that, “Apart from the thermonuclear warheads” (note the plural - it could carry up to 26!). They seriously considered building something the size of a locamotive powered by a nuclear ramjet leaving a trail of sonic and radioactive devestation in it’s wake and it lobbed thermonukes.
I was born way too early and in the wrong country because that’s utterly brilliantly mad. 1950s America with Elvis on the radio and me with my physics degrees and taste for the subtle mathematics of blowing the fuck out of stuff* working on a nuclear ramjet (wow!!!) and cars with fins and wasp-waisted ladies and wasp-waisted fighter jets (NACA Area Rule) would suit me about right.
Yet, it’s 2010 and I still don’t have my sodding jetpack and they’re thinking of powering the country with fucking windmills!
I wannabe George Jetson and I’m going to end-up as Barney Rubble.
When did it change? I’ve seen kid’s books from the ’50s and they celebrated speed and adventure and technology. Nowadays they don’t tell you how to build a radio to listen to Sputnik going beep but how you must compost otherwise Gaia will drown an ickle polar bear or some similar nonsense. When and how did this all go wrong? When and why did we give the fire back to the Gods?
*Apologies if that phrase is too technical.
Indeed. And not just when and why, but for whose benefit?

