<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boomershoot Proof of Concept</title>
	<link>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Random Nuclear Strikes &#187; Can&#8217;t We All Just Get Along?</title>
		<link>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-270443</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-270443</guid>
					<description>[...] So threepers, once you&amp;#8217;ve got your battle rifle and gear squared away (maybe including a specialty pistol) and you&amp;#8217;re all signed up for the next training class, why not reach out to a prag or two and find out if there&amp;#8217;s some organized political activity you don&amp;#8217;t know about where they could use your help &amp;#8212; your time, efforts, donations, whatever. Then don&amp;#8217;t sneer, don&amp;#8217;t mess up their plan by doing it your way, just help! What&amp;#8217;s the downside? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] So threepers, once you&#8217;ve got your battle rifle and gear squared away (maybe including a specialty pistol) and you&#8217;re all signed up for the next training class, why not reach out to a prag or two and find out if there&#8217;s some organized political activity you don&#8217;t know about where they could use your help &#8212; your time, efforts, donations, whatever. Then don&#8217;t sneer, don&#8217;t mess up their plan by doing it your way, just help! What&#8217;s the downside? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Random Nuclear Strikes &#187; For Kevin Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-230528</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 01:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-230528</guid>
					<description>[...] That very pistol&amp;#8217;s performance at Boomershoot 2008 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] That very pistol&#8217;s performance at Boomershoot 2008 [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-181087</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 08:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-181087</guid>
					<description>Guy, I don't believe there's any legal definition for a &quot;light carbine&quot; based on barrel length -- certainly not in California, and our gun laws are pretty ummm detailed.

The closest thing I can think of is that if you have a rifle receiver and reduce the barrel below 16.5&quot; you violate a law against a &quot;short-barreled rifle.&quot; However, if you start with a pistol receiver you can pretty much have any length barrel you like on it.

One of my .308 pistols has a 17.5&quot; barrel on it, and when I had that barrel on my Encore rifle receiver it was indeed a sweet-handling short rifle, or carbine if you will. But I like it better on my pistol receiver.

FYI, Thompson/Center receivers come from the factory designated as either a rifle or a pistol. Some would argue that a recent court decision makes this irrelevant, and for Federal law they may be right -- but California has its own law on the subject and we Californians have to keep careful track of whether we're slapping a short barrel on a T/C rifle receiver or a pistol receiver. Annoying, to be sure....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guy, I don&#8217;t believe there&#8217;s any legal definition for a &#8220;light carbine&#8221; based on barrel length &#8212; certainly not in California, and our gun laws are pretty ummm detailed.</p>
<p>The closest thing I can think of is that if you have a rifle receiver and reduce the barrel below 16.5&#8243; you violate a law against a &#8220;short-barreled rifle.&#8221; However, if you start with a pistol receiver you can pretty much have any length barrel you like on it.</p>
<p>One of my .308 pistols has a 17.5&#8243; barrel on it, and when I had that barrel on my Encore rifle receiver it was indeed a sweet-handling short rifle, or carbine if you will. But I like it better on my pistol receiver.</p>
<p>FYI, Thompson/Center receivers come from the factory designated as either a rifle or a pistol. Some would argue that a recent court decision makes this irrelevant, and for Federal law they may be right &#8212; but California has its own law on the subject and we Californians have to keep careful track of whether we&#8217;re slapping a short barrel on a T/C rifle receiver or a pistol receiver. Annoying, to be sure&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: guy</title>
		<link>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-170724</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-170724</guid>
					<description>&quot;my factory Encore pistol and its 15″ Bullberry barrel&quot;

I will never claim to be an expert on guns, but at 15&quot; is that still a pistol or is it a light carbine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;my factory Encore pistol and its 15″ Bullberry barrel&#8221;</p>
<p>I will never claim to be an expert on guns, but at 15&#8243; is that still a pistol or is it a light carbine?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-170719</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-170719</guid>
					<description>I wanted to see if I could detonate a boomer with my 7-30 Waters Contender pistols at that range, too, as the factory loads use a flat-nosed bullet. However, I had a bit of a forend problem and put them back in the case until next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to see if I could detonate a boomer with my 7-30 Waters Contender pistols at that range, too, as the factory loads use a flat-nosed bullet. However, I had a bit of a forend problem and put them back in the case until next year.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe Huffman</title>
		<link>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-170702</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-170702</guid>
					<description>My best estimate of your bullet velocity at 620 yards is just under 1500 fps. This is well into the &quot;gray area&quot; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boomershoot.org/general/BulletsBoomers.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;successful detonation velocities&lt;/a&gt;. With a very flat nosed bullet 1200 fps will do it. With a very pointed bullet it could take over 1700 fps.

Regardless, just hitting the targets at that range with pistols is impressive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My best estimate of your bullet velocity at 620 yards is just under 1500 fps. This is well into the &#8220;gray area&#8221; of <a href="http://www.boomershoot.org/general/BulletsBoomers.htm" rel="nofollow">successful detonation velocities</a>. With a very flat nosed bullet 1200 fps will do it. With a very pointed bullet it could take over 1700 fps.</p>
<p>Regardless, just hitting the targets at that range with pistols is impressive.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-170700</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-170700</guid>
					<description>Wasn't me! But I was telling folks to &quot;take two and give one to your friends,&quot; so you must have had a friendly genie stop by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t me! But I was telling folks to &#8220;take two and give one to your friends,&#8221; so you must have had a friendly genie stop by.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ry Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-170639</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.softgreenglow.com/wp/?p=5648#comment-170639</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the article you left at my shooting position; it was a great read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article you left at my shooting position; it was a great read.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
