Myth Busted

Like so many of the eco-socialist’s “beliefs”, this one was easily dispelled

DC’s green-approved buildings using more energy

Washington, D.C. may have the highest number of certified green buildings in the country, but research by  Environmental Policy Alliance suggests it might not be doing much good.

The free-market group analyzed the first round of energy usage data released by city officials Friday and found that large, privately-owned buildings that received the green energy certification Leadership in Energy Design (LEED) actually use more energy than buildings that didn’t receive this green stamp of approval.

LEED is the brainchild of the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), a private environmental group.

Washington, D.C.’s Department of Environment made the capital the first city in the nation to mandate LEED certifications in the construction of public buildings. The standards are now being phased in.

The results are measured in EUI’s, a unit that relates a building’s energy consumption to its size; the higher the number, the more energy is expended by a smaller building.

Take the Green Building Council’s Washington headquarters. Replete with the group’s top green-energy accolade, the platinum LEED certification, the USGBC’s main base comes in at 236 EUI. The average EUI for uncertified buildings in the capital? Just 199.

Certified buildings’ average comes in at 205 EUI, still less efficient than that didn’t take home the ultimate green trophy.

But I am sure that the “green” businesses that make up the USGBC made a decent chuck of change in getting developers and builders to fall for their trophy.

This entry was posted in Rampant Eco Socialism. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Myth Busted

  1. Rivrdog says:

    In Portland, just the cost of the LEED applications and paperwork adds a MINIMUM of $30,000 to construction costs.

Comments are closed.