I met the Plaintiff

Filed under: Heroes, Comrades and Brothers, Have Gun, Will Travel — David at 9:55 am on Sunday, July 6, 2008

that is, the pseudonymous gay plaintiff in the San Francisco gun-ban case. He attended the Halbrook/Kates event (see post below). Most people were, I believe, unaware of his presence.I got the chance to shake his hand and thank him. I told him what he was doing was “gutsy” and he smiled and agreed.

It takes time and effort to be selected for public housing in San Francisco, and by simply volunteering to be the plaintiff in this civil rights case, this man could lose his home.

For those who think that San Francisco’s various bans are the result of left-coast cluelessness rather than malevolence, the plaintiff noted that in his building’s community center, he’d heard discussion of gun bans as a deliberate tactic for use to get rid of a specific voting bloc.

The framed poster above, on display in the Independent Institute, was particularly apropos.

Stephen Halbrook and Don B. Kates

Filed under: Have Gun, Will Travel, Kewel! — David at 10:07 am on Saturday, July 5, 2008

I met both of these gentlemen Wednesday evening at the Independent Institute building in Oakland, where they spoke. Click all images for bigger versions.
UPDATE: DVDs, CDs and transcripts are available here. The fees are nominal and go to a good cause.
First, I met the PackingRat, who drove down from Sacramento to attend this event.

Me and the Packing Rat
His review is here. Excerpt:

Being in the presence of these two gentlemen was something different. To me, they were doing important work. This is not to say I don’t appreciate other research from other fields – far from it. But when there are intellectual leaders indulging us with information that can potentially affect our rights, one can’t help but to hang on to every word.

Here I am with Stephen Halbrook. I got a copy of his book, pre-publication galleys of which were distributed and used in the briefs for Heller. Both the PackingRat and I got our copies inscribed by Mr. H.
There was quite a crowd, including lots of Calgunners. Here’s one’s writeup.
Money quotes:

Libertarian chicks are hot. Not average, ‘hey there’s a girl in what’s usually a male enviroment “hot”‘ but, ‘wow, that girl would be hot anywhere, hot’.

Mr. Halbrook … seemed positively giddy - like he hasn’t come down since the Heller decision.

Mr. Kates was up next. Honestly, I was shocked he was so little. You have to understand, Don Kates is GIANT to me. I’ve read almost everything he’s written regarding guns and gun control. I admire his prose, love his wit - but his head barely cleared the podium.

Kates is a short guy. Here’s Halbrook speaking, for comparison:
Both men spoke about gun rights and the Heller case. Halbrook discussed things from the perspective of the historical evidence of the Founders’ intent; Kates provided a criminologist’s perspective with many facts & figures. Some highlights:
–One person observed that when traveling, his or her First Amendment, Fourth Amendment and other rights do not change from one state to the next. But we’re subject as gun owners to a patchwork of different state laws restricting our 2nd Amendment rights. When will the laws be uniform across the land? Halbrook responded that “we are at the very beginning of this enterprise,” and it will be many decades before we get to that point.
.

–Kates noted that it is a documented fact going back to the 1890s that law-abiding adult Americans simply don’t commit murder.

.

–One person asked, other than Cruikshank and Presser, what are the best arguments (of the other side) against application of the 2nd Amendment to the states by incorporation under the 14th Amendment? Don Kates answered, “There are none.”

.

–Another asked if Heller now invalidates the standing problems California cases have had in the 9th Circuit. Stephen Halbrook said “Yes,” with the caveat that incorporation has to happen first. A lot of the 9th Circuit’s arguments against the 2nd Amendment in past decisions have now been invalidated by Heller, so it’s come full circle for Halbrook, who was intimately involved in many of those earlier cases.

.

–Halbrook’s next book is on the Weimar Republic and how it passed gun-registration laws that, after the Nazis came to power, were used to disarm enemies of the state and Jews.

.

When the two finished speaking and answering questions, all assembled of course gave them a standing ovation:

.
Afterwards, my wife and I drove home and shared pizza with the PackingRat, who was gracious enough to allow me to talk his ear off. Thanks, Derek, for the T-shirt and some fine conversation.
.
All in all, a very memorable evening.

Some framed document at the Independent Institute

Filed under: Uncategorized — David at 10:06 am on Saturday, July 5, 2008

Some framed document

Originally uploaded by davidwhitewolf

Happy 232nd Birthday

Filed under: Heroes, Comrades and Brothers — Phil at 7:16 am on Friday, July 4, 2008

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. –Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.

He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:

For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing taxes on us without our consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:

For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:

For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:

For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:

For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

The Soundboard: Eclectica

Filed under: Kewel! — Phil at 8:21 am on Thursday, July 3, 2008

What with the SCOTUS releasing Heller last Thursday, the prearranged tracks were suspended while we celebrated.

But they’re back today. Or at least one of them is.

David has a track selection that I don’t own. Nor can I find it on the intarwebs.

The song is Condemnation by the Christian Metal group Six Feet Deep. No video, no audio, and I cannot currently download due to my Media Center Edition of XP not getting along with the sites that do that sort of thing.

So, here is Six Feet Deep’s website, so you can get a taste of what they sound like, and the lyrics are posted below the fold.

The second selection is actually one from Mrs. David, who has it on auto-loop.

It stars a pair of dudes featured here in the recent past who go by the name The Propellerheads, along with Mr. Bean’s favorite entertainer, the lovely, Ms. Shirley Bassey


Lastly, since I would like to bring you two tracks today, Les Claypool of Primus fame, Stewart Copeland of the recently reunited trio, The Police, and Trey Anastasio of Phish, got together to do the supergroup thing in 2001.

What was created was called Oysterhead, and the album was titled The Grand Pecking Order.

A little bit of all of them mixed together into a soup that had not been created before and has not been duplicated since.

Pseudo Suicide - Oysterhead

I dedicate this one to all the folks who decided that life wasn’t worth living and used a firearm to do the deed, doubling the statistics the anti-gun bigots use to try and make law abiding firearms owners look bad this week with their wall to wall reporting on these numbers.

To add, Professor Volokh has a few things to say about these stats.

(Push the button … )

D-Day +7

Filed under: Evil walks the earth — Phil at 7:47 am on Thursday, July 3, 2008

Well, it has been a week since the Heller decision hit and I have yet to see any blood running in the streets. Though the froth created by the wailing and gnashing of teeth is sort of pink.

It looks as though the DC City Council is just now getting around to obeying the Supreme Court’s wishes and voting to rescind the ban

With the unanimous support of his 12 colleagues, Phil Mendelson introduced a bill that would end the city’s handgun ban and make it legal for residents to keep firearms in their homes without requirements that trigger locks be used or that they be disassembled.

Mendelson’s bill would still require that guns be kept unloaded and disabled, but it would offer an exception for gun owners who say the firearm is present in the home for immediate self-defense.

……

The self-defense exception would also extend to people keeping a firearm in their place of business.

Since I’m certain that some overzealous police/prosecutor team is going to go after someone for having all of their firearms assembled and a couple of them loaded (say, a sensible handgun/shotgun combo), I guess we get to go back to court to find out how many firearms people are allowed to keep assembled and/or loaded, per the Bill of Rights.

In other DC news, TPM blogger, Brian Beutler was shot while being mugged for his cellphone. We here at RNS wish him a full and speedy recovery.

John Aravosis, who just the other day tried to say that muggers don’t want to hurt their victims, knows the neighborhood.

The neighborhood he was shot in, like a 5 minute walk from me, has an ongoing gang war on the very corner he was shot. It’s been going on for years. And years. And years. But DC is such an inept city, that all we hear about is how fighting crime is hard work. Sound familiar? I’ve looked at condos right next to where he was shot. $400,000 for a one bedroom. I laugh when I see places like that, because I know there’s a gang war going on about 100 feet away. And now this would be our second mugging-shooting we’ve had in the last month or so.

But to talk to these folks, they cannot see why arming oneself would be a wise idea in a place such as the one described above.

Hell, these gangs would have to hope that The Wife’s better nature calmed me down enough to not go Banger-Hunting. It’s been more than a few years, but I still remember the necessary skillsets.

Check out the comments to that post. It would be nice if the leftists could figure out that the crime rate in DC has been horrifying since the early 1970’s and that their attempts to lay this at the feet of Bush is just stupid namecalling.

Wakey, Wakey! Eggs and Bakey!

Filed under: Evil walks the earth — Phil at 7:45 am on Thursday, July 3, 2008

You think we have it bad over here, take a read at how NickM in the UK was awakened this morning

It was the phone. Well, the cat had to remove his paw from across my left arm (and looked most put-out about it, sorry Timmy) and I answered the phone. I had to answer it. It could have been a job for me or my wife, right? It was instead Her Majesties Revenue and Customs. The chill reached my bowels in seconds and the kitty ran off afrighted for similar reasons. Fortunately it wasn’t for me. Unfortunately it was for my wife. Apparently she owes them 1500 quid. This is primarily because they use self-assessment forms which NASA would deem a bit complicated, actually. This isn’t an outstanding debt. Oh, no! This is 2008/2009 tax year. This is on the basis of monies they think she’ll earn. And get this. If she doesn’t pay on the nail they are going to charge interest on it. Yes, interest on money not yet earned.

If I could get away with that I’d be sitting pretty. I could charge all the local owners of crappy Dells fifty notes (at least) up-front in case they go wrong. And if they didn’t pay I’d drag them into the courts.

But, of course, my wife’s (and mine and your) tax pays for vital stuff like schools and hospitals doesn’t it? So, why can’t we get an NHS dentist? Why can’t she get a blood-pressure monitor? Why can’t she get Implanon without driving half-way across the county? Why are the roads in a total fucking state? Why are the railways crap? Why are they closing down Jodrell Bank? Why, on 47% of our GDP, do we not even have the hint of a space program? What the fuck is it being spent on? What the fuck is it being spent on?

I’ve heard of and have even contemplated paying my taxes ahead of time so as to not have to worry about the possibility of getting stuck between February and April with saving up a chunk of change for the IRS.

Even having to let my employer take the money out of my check before I get to see it is offensive.

But being forced to pay on income you haven’t even earned? That should be so completely insulting to any thinking person that revolution is seriously considered.

The World According to BANANA’s and CAVE people

Filed under: Rampant Eco Socialism — Phil at 7:43 am on Thursday, July 3, 2008

All will become clear momentarily.

If you read your major dailies over the last couple weeks you’ve read about the BLM shutting down large solar projects.

And also the subsequent cries of despair from the fossil fuel denier crowd towards “the neocon Bush Administration” etc.

They would do better to look to their left and right, as well as into the mirror, before making such claims.

The Bureau of Land Management quietly decided in May that the development of solar plants in 119 million sun-soaked, federally owned acres in the western states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah would have to wait at least two years while bureaucrats sorted out their environmental impact.

For decades environmental groups have been pushing the government and private sector to develop more alternative sources of energy. But that campaign is beginning to look like a sham to cover the groups’ BANANA — Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything — activism.

To be fair, it appears the BLM acted without being forced by an environmentalist-filed lawsuit or activist pressure. And so far, the media are reporting that only a single group — the Wilderness Society — has expressed support for the moratorium.

Make no mistake, though. The environmental groups are the reason the BLM made its decision. Had they not spent the past 30 years rabidly crusading against development, reflexively defending wildlife habitats from minor and imaginary threats and demonizing economic progress, the solar projects would not have been interrupted.

Washington has become so overly sensitive to the possibility of vocal opposition on anything that has an environmental impact that it feels it must inoculate itself from the radicals — even when the project is one they should support without reservation.

Environmental groups at one time served a noble purpose. We are a cleaner nation and world now than we were in the groups’ formative years because they helped the West understand that it needed to clean up the mess from the Industrial Revolution.

But now they have become BANANA’s and CAVE — Citizens Against Virtually Everything — people. They are more interested in choking capitalism and imposing on the world a future without energy than they are with a clean planet.

True Dat!

It used to be the initials of British Columbia

Filed under: The Left is Never Right, Rampant Eco Socialism — Phil at 7:41 am on Thursday, July 3, 2008

But now, in the context of speaking of the governing body there, B.C. will forever be known to mean “Batshit Crazy”.

A new carbon tax on gasoline rapidly generated plenty of heat among summer visitors and British Columbia residents alike at filling stations Tuesday.

The plan is being phased in over five years to help drivers to understand the cost associated with generating greenhouse gases.

At present dollar exchange rates it starts at about nine cents a gallon, rising to 29 cents a gallon by 2012.

In Vancouver, customers at gas stations were pumped about the plan, many of them unhappily.

Stephanie Bincinto, who recently moved to the province from Quebec for her job as a flight attendant, said the high price of gasoline convinced her to use taxicabs rather than buy a new car.

“It sucks,” she said, pumping regular gas costing roughly $5.80 U.S. a gallon into a rental truck she was using for the move. “I was looking to buy a new one, but now with the price of gas I’m not interested.

Oh, the joys of creeping socialism.

So, how’s that health care treating you?

Oh, not that well I see.

Becoming the 51st State doesn’t look so bad now, does it?

Brilliant!

Filed under: Kewel! — David at 1:41 pm on Wednesday, July 2, 2008

The anonymous gay plaintiff in the San Francisco gun-ban case is named Guy Montag Doe.

For those who don’t get it, the name refers to the protagonist of this book.

Kudos to Jason Davis of Trutanich-Michel, who came up with the idea.

Next Page »